Blogs

Science at its core involves questioning the world around us and challenging existing beliefs. The engine of the scientific process is proposing a testable hypothesis and designing studies to see if the hypothesis withstands the challenge. Disagreements about scientific questions and subsequent conclusions should be welcomed and will ultimately improve our collective knowledge. Science is built for challenges and disagreements. However, it is critical to the health and well-being of our shared scientific endeavors and the Society that we challenge the science, not the person conducting the science or the entity reporting it. When you attack the person or the Society, the conversation devolves and leaves the realm of scientific disagreement, depriving the community of the open and informative conversation that is the foundation of scientific advancement. Personal accusations and threats simply have no place in scientific discourse. 

Our shared enterprise in toxicology is understanding how chemicals and nonchemical factors affect the health of people and the environment. As toxicologists, we understand that we must test the safety of medicines, foods, consumer products, etc., prior to bringing them to market or releasing them into the environment. While we understand this, we need to do a much better job communicating the importance of our science to the public. Providing training and information around science communication continues to be a priority for SOT.  

I hope that we can use the challenges we face to strengthen our commitment to toxicology and to each other. I look forward to seeing you in San Diego!